Saloom v. Holder

Saloom v. Holder, 307 N.E.2d 890 (Ind. Ct. App. 1974)

Court: Indiana Court of Appeals · State Appellate Courts
Decided: March 14, 1974
Docket: No. 572A215
Judges: Buchanan
Citations: 307 N.E.2d 890158 Ind. App. 177

Cited by 9

Opinion

307 N.E.2d 890 (1974)

Elizabeth SALOOM, Appellant (Plaintiff below),

John R. HOLDER and the City of Indianapolis, Appellees (Defendants below).

No. 572A215.

Court of Appeals of Indiana, Second District.

March 14, 1974.

*891 R. Davy Eaglesfield, III, Barnes, Hickam, Pantzer & Boyd, Indianapolis, for appellant.

Charles B. Huppert, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Gary R. Landau, Corp. Counsel, Indianapolis, for appellees.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

BUCHANAN, Judge.

Appellant (Saloom) asserts in her Petition For Rehearing that we refused to state in our opinion whether the violation of certain municipal ordinances were misdemeanors or civil offenses. Neither this issue, nor any variation of it, was argued by Saloom.

The Statement of Issues in Saloom's brief bearing on this question (Issues, 1, 2, 3, and 4) are framed exclusively in terms of the assumption that violation of the ordinances in question were misdemeanors. Saloom's entire argument in her brief continues in the same vein, e.g., "Appellant and appellees agree that the municipal ordinances under which appellant was arrested were misdemeanors at the time of her arrest." (Appellant's Brief, p. 9.)

Any question as to whether violations of the ordinances involved were civil or criminal have been effectively waived by Saloom. Issues not argued are waived (Rule AP. 8.3(A)(7)) and they may not be raised for the first time in the reply brief. Flick v. Simpson, (1970) 145 Ind. App. 698 , 255 N.E.2d 118 ; Michaels v. Johnson, (1967) 140 Ind. App. 389 , 225 N.E.2d 581 ; Miller Monuments, Inc. v. Asbestos Insulating, etc., (1962) 134 Ind. App. 48 , 185 N.E.2d 533 ; State v. Marion Circuit Court, (1958) 238 Ind. 637 , 153 N.E.2d 327 .

Ergo, the Petition is denied.

SULLIVAN, P.J., and WHITE, J., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 9 cases

View all citing references →

State Appellate Courts9

Relies on it most ⓘ

Anderson Mattress Co. v. First State Insurance Co.617 N.E.2d 932 (Ind. Ct. App. 1993)
Hochstedler v. St. Joseph County Solid Waste Management District770 N.E.2d 910 (Ind. Ct. App. 2002)
BD. OF CTY. COM'RS OF ST. JOSEPH v. Tinkham491 N.E.2d 578 (Ind. Ct. App. 1986)
Weenig v. Wood349 N.E.2d 235 (Ind. Ct. App. 1976)
Kranda v. Houser-Norborg Medical Corp.419 N.E.2d 1024 (Ind. Ct. App. 1981)
Senco Products, Inc. v. Riley434 N.E.2d 561 (Ind. Ct. App. 1982)

Most recent

Hochstedler v. St. Joseph County Solid Waste Management District770 N.E.2d 910 (Ind. Ct. App. 2002)
Mid State Bank v. 84 Lumber Co.629 N.E.2d 909 (Ind. Ct. App. 1994)
Anderson Mattress Co. v. First State Insurance Co.617 N.E.2d 932 (Ind. Ct. App. 1993)
BD. OF CTY. COM'RS OF ST. JOSEPH v. Tinkham491 N.E.2d 578 (Ind. Ct. App. 1986)
Midwest Natural Gas Corp. v. Locke Stove Co.435 N.E.2d 85 (Ind. Ct. App. 1982)
Senco Products, Inc. v. Riley434 N.E.2d 561 (Ind. Ct. App. 1982)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

Depth	Case	Cited by
	State Etc. v. Marion Cir. Ct., 153 N.E.2d 327 (Ind. 1958)	17
	Miller Monuments, Inc. v. Asbestos Insulating & Roofing Co., 185 N.E.2d 533 (Ind. Ct. App. 1962)	13
	Flick v. Simpson, 252 N.E.2d 508 (Ind. Ct. App. 1969)	14
	Michaels v. Johnson, 223 N.E.2d 585 (Ind. Ct. App. 1967)	8

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list