Summonte v. First American Title Insurance Co.
Opinion
184 N.J. Super. 96 (1981) 445 A.2d 409
JOSEPH A. SUMMONTE AND LAURETTA A. SUMMONTE, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY AND CONGRESS TITLE CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Submitted December 15, 1981. Decided December 31, 1981.
Before Judges MICHELS, McELROY and J.H. COLEMAN.
Dennis M. Gonski, attorney for appellants.
Stokes & Throckmorton, attorneys for respondents ( Edward C. Stokes, III, of counsel and on the brief).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Chancery Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Haines in his written opinion reported in Summonte v. First Amer. Title Ins. Co., 180 N.J. Super. 605 (Ch.Div. 1981).
Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(presence of undetected lien reduced the value of the insured’s property and that was an actual loss; insured did not first have to first pay the lien or suffer foreclosure in order to sustain a loss under the policy)
Cited by 9 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Stewart Title Guaranty Co. v. Greenlands Realty, LLC
- Shada v. Title & Trust Co. of Fla.
- Universal Holdings II Ltd. Partnership v. Overlake Christian Church
- Wohlegmuth v. 560 Ocean Club
- Clients' Security Fund of Bar of New Jersey v. Security Title
- RTC Mortgage Trust 1994 N-1 v. Fidelity National Title Insurance
Most recent
- Universal Holdings II Ltd. Partnership v. Overlake Christian Church
- RTC Mortgage Trust 1994 N-1 v. Fidelity National Title Insurance
- Stewart Title Guaranty Co. v. Greenlands Realty, LLC
- Wohlegmuth v. 560 Ocean Club
- Clients' Security Fund of Bar of New Jersey v. Security Title
- Griffith v. Safeco Title Insurance
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.