In re Multidistrict Civil Actions Involving the Air Crash Disaster
In Re Multidistrict Civil Actions Involving the AIR CRASH DISASTER AT the GREATER CINCINNATI AIRPORT (CONSTANCE, KENTUCKY) on November 8, 1965
Opinion
OPINION AND ORDER ALFRED P. MURRAH, Judge of the Panel.
This matter came up for consideration on August 8,1968 pursuant to the Panel’s order to show cause why the actions listed on the attached Schedule A should not be consolidated and transferred to a district or districts other than those in which they are now pending. This show cause order was entered on the initiative of the Panel pursuant to section 1407(c) (i).
On November 8, 1965, American Airlines Flight 383 crashed while making its final approach to the Greater Cincinnati Airport. Fifty-eight of the sixty-two persons on board were killed. There are thirteen civil actions arising from this accident presently pending in six different federal district courts.
1
All counsel in the cases listed on Schedule A were notified of the hearing and none who appeared opposed consolidation and transfer. Counsel for certain of the passenger-plaintiffs objected to the inclusion of the “crew cases” and the actions commenced by the airlines against the United States with the “passenger cases” on the ground that the former present substantially different and more complex issues. Those actions may indeed present substantially different legal issues but many of the fact questions are common to all cases. Cf. In re Air Crash Disaster At Greater Cincinnati Airport (Constance, Kentucky) On November 20,1967, 298 F.Supp. 353 (Judicial Panel on Multidistriet Litigation, 1968). Counsel in the passenger cases is concerned that consolidation of all cases may delay trial of the “passenger cases” but they may be separated and remanded pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407 (a) as soon as pretrial is completed as to them.
Counsel appearing for all parties readily conceded that the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky is the most appropriate court to conduct the pretrial proceedings. The situs of the crash, many of the witnesses and much of the documentation is located within or convenient to the Eastern District of Kentucky. Chief Judge Mac Swinford is willing and able to accept the responsibility for supervising the pretrial of these cases. We are satisfied that the *52 consolidation of all cases arising from the November 8, 1965 crash in the Eastern District of Kentucky will be for the convenience of parties and witnesses and will best promote the just and efficient conduct of these cases.
It is therefore ordered that the seven actions listed on the attached Schedule A pending in districts other than the Eastern District of Kentucky be and the same are hereby transferred on the initiative of the Panel under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Eastern District of Kentucky and assigned to the Honorable Mac Swinford, Chief Judge of said district, with the consent in writing of the transferee court which has been filed with the Clerk of the Panel.
1
. One case, Creasy v. American Airlines, et al., was tried to jury in the Northern District of Texas. The jury found the airline alone negligent and awarded the plaintiff $175,000 in damages.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 7 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- In re "East of the Rockies" Concrete Pipe Antitrust Cases
- In re Multidistrict Civil Antitrust Actions Involving Antibiotic Drugs
- In re Mid-Air Collision Near Fairland, Indiana
- In re Multidistrict Private Civil Treble Damage Litigation Involving Gypsum Wallboard
- In re Westec Corporation
- In re Air Crash Disaster in the Ionian Sea on September 8, 1974
Most recent
- In re Air Crash Disaster in the Ionian Sea on September 8, 1974
- In re Air Crash Near Denver, Colorado on October 3, 1969
- In re Mid-Air Collision Near Fairland, Indiana
- In re Westec Corporation
- In re "East of the Rockies" Concrete Pipe Antitrust Cases
- In re Multidistrict Private Civil Treble Damage Litigation Involving Gypsum Wallboard
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.