TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Alboum v. City of Newark

Abraham Alboum, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the City of Newark, a Municipal Corporation, and Thomas E. Hunt, Revenue Director of the City of Newark, Defendants-Respondents

Alboum v. City of Newark, 126 A.2d 885 (N.J. 1956)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 19, 1956
Judges
Per Curiam
Citations
126 A.2d 88522 N.J. 5711956 N.J. LEXIS 203

Opinion — Per Curiam

Pee Cueiam.

The plaintiff-appellant filed a taxpayer’s suit in the Superior Court, Chancery Division, seeking to restrain the City of Newark from proceeding with a program to marshall information (for the use of the local assessor) through the employment of experienced appraisers. The matter was heard in response to an order to show cause why the city should not be so enjoined and following the presentation of briefs and affidavits the order was dismissed and judgment rendered for the defendants.

Plaintiff appealed the cause and we certified prior to a consideration by the Superior Court, Appellate Division. Subsequent to the filing of the notice of appeal the Legislature enacted L.

1956, c.

48, R. S. Cum. Supp.

40:50-9 et seq., which, inter alia, expressly empowers the governing body of any municipality to contract for the preparation and execution of a complete program for the revaluation of real property for the use of local assessors.

At the oral argument counsel for the defendants advised the court that the City of Newark had invited proposals for the work but has not acted thereon and intended to conform its preliminary steps for the revaluation program to the statutory advantages and requirements of L.

1956, c. 48, and that its future actions in this regard would be in conformance therewith.

In view of this, the issue presented for decision is moot. We are not, however, to be understood as holding nor inti *573 mating that the statutory law relating to the assessment of property for taxation purposes existing prior to the passage of L.

1956, c. 48, would not support the action contemplated by the City of Newark.

The appeal is dismissed. No costs will be taxed to any party.

For dismissal- — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Heher, Oliphant, Wacheneeld, Burling and Jacobs — 6.

Opposed — None.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1957: 11983: 11989: 12010: 119572026peak 1957 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services9 A.3d 882 (N.J. 2010)
  2. Berkley Arms Apartment Corp. v. Hackensack City6 N.J. Tax 260 (N.J. Tax Ct. 1983)
  3. Switz v. Township of Middletown130 A.2d 15 (N.J. 1957)
  4. Last Chance Development v. Kean556 A.2d 796 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1989)

Most recent

  1. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services9 A.3d 882 (N.J. 2010)
  2. Last Chance Development v. Kean556 A.2d 796 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1989)
  3. Berkley Arms Apartment Corp. v. Hackensack City6 N.J. Tax 260 (N.J. Tax Ct. 1983)
  4. Switz v. Township of Middletown130 A.2d 15 (N.J. 1957)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list