TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State ex rel. Offerdahl v. State

State Ex Rel. Offerdahl, Petitioner, v. State and Another, Respondents

State ex rel. Offerdahl v. State, 116 N.W.2d 809 (Wis. 1962)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Wisconsin Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 13, 1962
Judges
Wilkie
Citations
116 N.W.2d 80917 Wis. 2d 334

Opinion — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

Relator submitted to the jurisdiction of the circuit court by making his motion to dismiss in that court. Having done so, he can no longer seek habeas corpus to test the sufficiency of the evidence at the preliminary examination. The order denying such motion is a non-appealable order.

State v. Leikness (August Term, 1960, State No. 33, decided March 7, 1961), unreported.

The issue raised with respect to the failure to provide relator with separate counsel to represent him at the preliminary hearing is without merit. There is no constitutional right to be provided with counsel at a preliminary hearing arising under the United States constitution.

Odell v. Burke (7th Cir. 1960), 281 Fed. (2d) 782, certiorari denied, 364 U. S. 875 , 81 Sup. Ct 119, 5 L. Ed. (2d) 96. Neither does such a right exist under sec. 7, art. I, Wis. Const., because a preliminary hearing is not a criminal prosecution within the meaning of this constitutional provision.

Hawk v. State (1949), 151 Neb. 717 , 39 N. W. (2d) 561, 567 ; cf.

State ex rel. Kennon v. Hanley (1946), 249 Wis. 399, 401 , 24 N. W. (2d) 683 . Sec. 957.26, Stats., does not require that relator be provided with counsel prior to arraignment, absent any attempt to take depositions. However, while not constitutionally necessary, the practice of appointing counsel prior to the preliminary hearing is to be encouraged.

Therefore, it is ordered that leave to maintain the instant proceeding in this court by relator is denied.

Wilkie, J., took no part.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 10 cases

View all citing references →
1965: 21966: 11967: 11968: 11969: 11970: 11971: 11987: 11993: 119652026peak 1965 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Hawk v. State, 39 N.W.2d 561 (Neb. 1949) 26
State ex rel. Kennon v. Hanley, 24 N.W.2d 683 (Wis. 1946) 9

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list