TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Mosby v. Office of Professional Conduct

Lori A. MOSBY v. OFFICE of PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT (Of the Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct)

Mosby v. Office of Pro. Conduct, 156 S.W.3d 253 (Ark. 2004)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Arkansas · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 25, 2004
Docket
No. 04-241
Judges
Per Curiam
Citations
156 S.W.3d 253356 Ark. 5002004 Ark. LEXIS 176

Opinion — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

On October 27, 2003, the Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct, Panel B, reprimanded Lori A. Mosby for unprofessional conduct, assessed a fine of $2,500, ordered her to pay costs of $50, and ordered her to attend two additional “ethics” hours of continuing legal education, in addition to the one ethics hour required during each reporting period for attorneys in Arkansas. The findings and order of the committee were filed with the supreme court clerk on January 31, 2003.

Section 12(C) of the Procedures Regulating Professional Conduct (2003) provides that notice and perfection of an appeal shall be in accordance with the Rules of Appellate Procedure — • Civil and Rules of the Arkansas Supreme Court governing appeals in civil matters. If no appeal is perfected within the time allowed and in the manner provided, the action of the panel shall be final and binding on all parties. Id.

Ms. Mosby filed a timely notice of appeal under Ark. R. App. P. — Civ. 4(a) on November 26, 2003, making the deadline for filing the record ninety days later, on February 24, 2004. Ms. Mosby tendered the record to the supreme court clerk on February 27, 2004. Ark. R. App. P. — Civ. 5(a) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure requires that a record must be tendered within ninety days of the date of the notice of appeal, unless a motion to extend the time has been granted. See Mitchell v. Mountain View, 304 Ark. 585 , 803 S.W.2d 556 (1991). No such motion was requested.

Now before us is appellant’s motion for rule on the clerk, seeking to lodge the record belatedly. In support of her motion, Ms. Mosby asserts that the late tender of the record was the fault of the court reporter in failing to provide the transcript in time for her to file it timely. It is the duty of counsel, not the judge, the clerk, or court reporter to perfect an appeal. Davis v. Williamson, 353 Ark. 225 , 114 S.W.3d 216 (2003).

It was clearly the duty of Ms. Mosby to tender the record to this court in a timely manner, but she failed to do so. Accordingly, the motion for rule on clerk must be denied. The action of Panel B of the Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct is final.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

2005: 12006: 12022: 12023: 120052026peak 2005 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Wright v. City of Little Rock233 S.W.3d 644 (Ark. 2006)
  2. Waste Management & Transportation Insurance v. Estridge210 S.W.3d 869 (Ark. 2005)
  3. David Kinder v. Wendy Kinder2022 Ark. App. 39, 639 S.W.3d 882
  4. Jones v. BowmanNo. 4:22-cv-01239 (E.D. Ark. Feb. 3, 2023)

Most recent

  1. Jones v. BowmanNo. 4:22-cv-01239 (E.D. Ark. Feb. 3, 2023)
  2. David Kinder v. Wendy Kinder2022 Ark. App. 39, 639 S.W.3d 882
  3. Wright v. City of Little Rock233 S.W.3d 644 (Ark. 2006)
  4. Waste Management & Transportation Insurance v. Estridge210 S.W.3d 869 (Ark. 2005)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Mitchell v. City of Mountain View, 803 S.W.2d 556 (Ark. 1991) 8
Davis v. Williamson, 114 S.W.3d 216 (Ark. 2003) 6

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list