Commonwealth v. Britton
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. George BRITTON, Appellant
Opinion of the Court
*621 ORDER PER CURIAM.
Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently granted.
ZAPPALA, J., files a dissenting statement.
Dissent
ZAPPALA, Justice,
dissenting.
Not only would I reach the merits of this appeal, but I would reverse the Appellant’s conviction and grant him a new trial. It is clear from the record that the trial judge exceeded his proper duty by his extensive interrogation of the Appellant. Commonwealth v. Myma, 278 Pa. 505 , 123 A. 486 (1924). See Commonwealth v. Britton, 334 Pa.Super. 203, 222 , 482 A.2d 1294, 1304 (1984) (dissenting opinion of Spaeth, P.J.).
Combined text as published — syllabus, headnotes and all opinions in one document
509 Pa. 620 (1986) 506 A.2d 895
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee,
v.
George BRITTON, Appellant.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued October 25, 1985. Decided March 31, 1986.
John W. Packel, Chief/Appeals Div., Asst. Public Defender, Jules Epstein, Philadelphia, for appellant.
Robert B. Lawler, Chief/Appeals Div., Eric B. Henson, Jane Cutler Greenspan, Asst. Dist. Attys., for appellee.
Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, HUTCHINSON, ZAPPALA and PAPADAKOS, JJ.
*621 ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently granted.
ZAPPALA, J., files a dissenting statement.
ZAPPALA, Justice, dissenting.
Not only would I reach the merits of this appeal, but I would reverse the Appellant's conviction and grant him a new trial. It is clear from the record that the trial judge exceeded his proper duty by his extensive interrogation of the Appellant. Commonwealth v. Myma, 278 Pa. 505 , 123 A. 486 (1924). See Commonwealth v. Britton, 334 Pa.Super. 203, 222 , 482 A.2d 1294, 1304 (1984) (dissenting opinion of Spaeth, P.J.).
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(illegal sentence may be vacated and amended directly or remanded for, resentencing)
Cited by 12 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.