TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance v. Latham

Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance Company v. Latham

Frankenmuth Mut. Ins. v. Latham, 302 N.W.2d 329 (Mich. Ct. App. 1981)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Michigan Court of Appeals · State Appellate Courts
Decided
January 21, 1981
Docket
No. 46363
Judges
Kaufman, Burns, Warren
Citations
302 N.W.2d 329103 Mich. App. 661981 Mich. App. LEXIS 2675

Opinion — Burns

R. B. Burns, J.

Plaintiff, Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance Company (hereinafter Frankenmuth), brought this action for a declaration of rights under an automobile insurance policy issued by it through the Michigan Basic Automobile Insurance Placement Facility to defendant Bennie Latham. Approximately two and a half months after the issuance of the policy, an automobile owned and operated by Latham struck and injured a pedestrian, Jawine McCullan, a minor. Through her next friend, Delores Ferguson, McCullan brought an action in tort against Latham. Frankenmuth subsequently brought this action against Latham, McCullan and Ferguson. McCullan and Ferguson filed a counterclaim against Frankenmuth and a third-party complaint against Allstate Insurance Company (hereinafter Allstate), which had been assigned McCullan’s claim for personal protection insurance benefits pursuant to the assigned claims plan authorized by MCL 500.3171 et seq.;

MSA 24.13171 et seq.

Upon a stipulation of facts submitted by the parties, the trial court held that the policy issued by plaintiff Frankenmuth was in full force and effect. Plaintiff appeals.

When Latham applied for the insurance policy, *68 he represented to plaintiff that he had a valid Ohio driver’s license, although he had a Michigan address and was employed in Michigan. In applying for his Ohio license, Latham had represented that he was not under any suspension or revocation of driving privileges in Ohio or in any other state. Frankenmuth did not check Latham’s driving record in Ohio or Michigan. After Latham was involved in the automobile accident which underlies this action, Frankenmuth checked Latham’s driving record in Michigan and discovered numerous suspensions, revocations and driving infractions which would have been material to Frankenmuth’s determination to issue insurance coverage. On September 7, 1977, Frankenmuth filed its complaint in the instant action, seeking to have the court declare that plaintiffs policy with Latham was void ab initio.

We find that the trial court correctly held that the policy was in full force and effect.

State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins Co v Kurylowicz, 67 Mich App 568, 574 ; 242 NW2d 530 (1976), holds that:

" 'The liability of the insurer with respect to insurance required by the act becomes absolute whenever injury or damage covered by such policy occurs * * * no statement made by the insured or on his behalf and no violation of the policy provisions may be used to defeat or avoid the policy.’ ” See also Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange v Ayvazian, 62 Mich App 94, 100 ; 233 NW2d 200 (1975).

Affirmed. Costs to defendant Allstate.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 12 cases

View all citing references →
1984: 31985: 21986: 11989: 11990: 11991: 21992: 11994: 119842026peak 1984 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Coburn v. Fox389 N.W.2d 424 (Mich. 1986)
  2. Cunningham v. Citizens Insurance Co. of America350 N.W.2d 283 (Mich. Ct. App. 1984)
  3. OHIO FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. Michigan Mutual Insurance Company445 N.W.2d 228 (Mich. Ct. App. 1989)
  4. Travelers Insurance Companies v. Rogers579 N.E.2d 1328 (Ind. Ct. App. 1991)
  5. Van Horn v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance641 A.2d 195 (Md. 1994)
  6. Darnell v. Auto-Owners Insurance369 N.W.2d 243 (Mich. Ct. App. 1985)

Most recent

  1. Van Horn v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance641 A.2d 195 (Md. 1994)
  2. Slaby v. Cox827 P.2d 18 (Kan. 1992)
  3. Travelers Insurance Companies v. Rogers579 N.E.2d 1328 (Ind. Ct. App. 1991)
  4. Continental Western Insurance v. Clay811 P.2d 1202 (Kan. 1991)
  5. Dunn v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America798 P.2d 955 (Kan. Ct. App. 1990)
  6. OHIO FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. Michigan Mutual Insurance Company445 N.W.2d 228 (Mich. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. Kurylowicz, 242 N.W.2d 530 (Mich. Ct. App. 1976) 35
Detroit Auto. Inter-Ins. Exch. v. Ayvazian, 233 N.W.2d 200 (Mich. Ct. App. 1975) 33

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list