TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Lundy v. Messer

Lundy v. Messer, 167 N.E.2d 278 (Ill. App. Ct. 1960)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Court of Illinois · State Appellate Courts
Decided
March 8, 1960
Docket
No. Gen. No. 11,313
Judges
Justice Crow
Citations
167 N.E.2d 27825 Ill. App. 2d 5131960 Ill. App. LEXIS 567
Cited by 5

Opinion

25 Ill. App.2d 513 (1960) 167 N.E.2d 278

Lyman R. Lundy and John L. Butler, d/b/a Lundy, Butler & Lundy, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

Hazel R. Messer, et al., Defendants. Hazel R. Messer, Appellant.

Gen. No. 11,313.

Illinois Appellate Court — Second District, Second Division.

March 8, 1960. Rehearing denied June 8, 1960.

John R. Snively, for appellant.

Large, Reno, Zahm, and Folgate (H. Emmett Folgate, of counsel) for appellees.

(Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion by JUSTICE CROW.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Not to be published in full.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 5 cases

View all citing references →
1967: 11991: 12010: 12011: 219672026peak 2011 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Veal v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. (In re Veal)450 B.R. 897 (9th Cir. BAP 2011)
  2. Yorke v. Citibank, N.A. (In re BNT Terminals, Inc.)125 B.R. 963 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1991)
  3. Weingartner v. Chase Home Finance, LLC702 F. Supp. 2d 1276 (D. Nev. 2010)
  4. In re Veal449 B.R. 542 (9th Cir. BAP 2011)
  5. Rago v. Cosmopolitan National Bank232 N.E.2d 88 (Ill. App. Ct. 1967)

Most recent

  1. Veal v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. (In re Veal)450 B.R. 897 (9th Cir. BAP 2011)
  2. In re Veal449 B.R. 542 (9th Cir. BAP 2011)
  3. Weingartner v. Chase Home Finance, LLC702 F. Supp. 2d 1276 (D. Nev. 2010)
  4. Yorke v. Citibank, N.A. (In re BNT Terminals, Inc.)125 B.R. 963 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1991)
  5. Rago v. Cosmopolitan National Bank232 N.E.2d 88 (Ill. App. Ct. 1967)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list