TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Roll v. Timberman

Roll v. Timberman, 232 A.2d 147 (N.J. 1967)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 30, 1967
Citations
232 A.2d 14750 N.J. 841967 N.J. LEXIS 412

Opinion

50 N.J. 84 (1967)

CHARLES EDWARD ROLL, ETC., PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER,

v.

BRUCE E. TIMBERMAN, ET ALS., DEFENDANTS AND TOWNSHIP OF HARRISON, THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

CORA E. MARTIN, ADMINISTRATRIX, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

June 30, 1967.

Messrs. Brown, Connery, Kulp & Wille and Mr. George F. Kugler, Jr. for the petitioner.

Messrs. Orlando & Cummins and Messrs. McCord, Farrell, Eynon & Munyon for the respondents.

Denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1984: 11987: 119842026peak 1984 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Smith v. Nieves485 A.2d 1066 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1984)
  2. Wood v. City of Linden526 A.2d 1093 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1987)

Most recent

  1. Wood v. City of Linden526 A.2d 1093 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1987)
  2. Smith v. Nieves485 A.2d 1066 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1984)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list