TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Myers v. HARRISBURG TAXI. AND BAGGAGE CO.

Myers v. Harrisburg Taxi. & Baggage Co., 82 A.2d 14 (Pa. 1951)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 27, 1951
Judges
Drew, C.J., Stern, Stearne, Jones, Bell, Ladner and Chidsey
Citations
82 A.2d 14368 Pa. 201951 Pa. LEXIS 438
Cited by 6 2 descriptions by later courts

Opinion

368 Pa. 20 (1951)

Myers, Appellant,

v.

Harrisburg Taxicab and Baggage Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued May 21, 1951. June 27, 1951.

Before DREW, C.J., STERN, STEARNE, JONES, BELL, LADNER and CHIDSEY, JJ.

*21 Paul H. Rhoads, with him J. Mettler Pensyl and Rhoads & Sinon, for appellant.

F. Brewster Wickersham, with him Metzger & Wickersham, for appellee, was not heard.

OPINION PER CURIAM, June 27, 1951:

The order appealed from is affirmed on the opinion of the court below.

Order affirmed, appellant to pay the costs.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 6 cases

View all citing references →
1955: 11959: 11971: 21976: 219552026peak 1971 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Kraynick v. HERTZ277 A.2d 144 (Pa. 1971)
  2. BALK v. Ford Motor Co.285 A.2d 128 (Pa. 1971)
  3. DiNenno v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.369 A.2d 738 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1976)
  4. Kuntz v. Lanbar Hotel Co., Inc.110 A.2d 249 (Pa. 1955)
  5. Rossi v. McDonnell18 Pa. D. & C.2d 550 (1959)
  6. Schutte v. Valley Bargain Center, Inc.73 Pa. D. & C.2d 256 (1976)

Most recent

  1. DiNenno v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.369 A.2d 738 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1976)
  2. Schutte v. Valley Bargain Center, Inc.73 Pa. D. & C.2d 256 (1976)
  3. BALK v. Ford Motor Co.285 A.2d 128 (Pa. 1971)
  4. Kraynick v. HERTZ277 A.2d 144 (Pa. 1971)
  5. Rossi v. McDonnell18 Pa. D. & C.2d 550 (1959)
  6. Kuntz v. Lanbar Hotel Co., Inc.110 A.2d 249 (Pa. 1955)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list