Ray v. California Home Building Loan Co.
Opinion
7 Cal.App.2d 275 (1935)
MARTIN E. RAY et al., Petitioners,
v.
CALIFORNIA HOME BUILDING LOAN COMPANY, etc., et al., Respondents.
Civ. No. 9890.
California Court of Appeals. First Appellate District, Division One.
May 31, 1935.
Ellis, Lyman & Steindorf for Petitioners.
No appearance for Respondents.
The Court.
[1] Ordinarily mandamus will not lie to compel a transfer of corporate stock; a suit in equity is the *276 proper remedy. There is nothing contained in the petition to show that this remedy is inadequate. (Spangenberg v. Western Heavy Hardware & Iron Co., 166 Cal. 284 [ 135 P. 1127 ].) The petition is denied.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.