TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

541 BRIAR PLACE CORPORATION v. Harman

541 Briar Place Corp. v. Harman, 196 N.E.2d 498 (Ill. App. Ct. 1964)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Court of Illinois · State Appellate Courts
Decided
January 30, 1964
Docket
No. Gen. No. 49,268
Judges
Justice Dempsey
Citations
196 N.E.2d 49846 Ill. App. 2d 11964 Ill. App. LEXIS 1160
Cited by 10

Opinion

46 Ill. App.2d 1 (1964) 196 N.E.2d 498

541 Briar Place Corporation, Plaintiff, Counter Defendant and Appellee,

v.

Oscar Harman, Defendant, Counter Claimant Appellant.

Gen. No. 49,268.

Illinois Appellate Court — First District, Third Division.

January 30, 1964.

Oscar Wyclif Harman, of Chicago, for appellant.

No brief filed for appellee.

(Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion by JUSTICE DEMPSEY.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Not to be published in full.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 10 cases

View all citing references →
1965: 11966: 31967: 11968: 11969: 21971: 11972: 119652026peak 1966 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Russell v. License Appeal Commission273 N.E.2d 650 (Ill. App. Ct. 1971)
  2. Metcoff v. Metcoff280 N.E.2d 572 (Ill. App. Ct. 1972)
  3. Perez v. Janota246 N.E.2d 42 (Ill. App. Ct. 1969)
  4. Werbeck v. Werbeck217 N.E.2d 502 (Ill. App. Ct. 1966)
  5. Mello v. Lepisto222 N.E.2d 543 (Ill. App. Ct. 1966)
  6. Mutual Truck Parts Co., Inc. v. Nelson216 N.E.2d 301 (Ill. App. Ct. 1966)

Most recent

  1. Metcoff v. Metcoff280 N.E.2d 572 (Ill. App. Ct. 1972)
  2. Russell v. License Appeal Commission273 N.E.2d 650 (Ill. App. Ct. 1971)
  3. American National Bank & Trust Co. v. City of Chicago249 N.E.2d 148 (Ill. App. Ct. 1969)
  4. Perez v. Janota246 N.E.2d 42 (Ill. App. Ct. 1969)
  5. Woodward v. Woodward238 N.E.2d 269 (Ill. App. Ct. 1968)
  6. Parkside Realty Co. v. License Appeal Commission231 N.E.2d 654 (Ill. App. Ct. 1967)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list