TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In Matter of Trueblood

In the Matter of Karen S. TRUEBLOOD

In Matter of Trueblood, 616 N.E.2d 8 (Ind. 1993)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Indiana Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 18, 1993
Docket
No. 45S00-9209-DI-672
Citations
616 N.E.2d 81993 Ind. LEXIS 941993 WL 228214

Opinion

ORDER OF SUSPENSION Comes now the hearing officer, appointed by this Court pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 23, and tenders his findings of fact, conclusions of law and recommendation that the Respondent, Karen S. True-blood, be suspended from the practice of law, pursuant to Admis.Dise.R. 28(14)(b) and Trial Rule 37(b)(2) of the Indiana Rules of Trial Procedure, for her failure to comply with discovery.

And this Court, being duly advised, now finds that the Respondent has repeatedly disregarded the hearing officer's orders to comply with discovery and that, accordingly, the hearing officer's findings, conclusions and recommendations should be accepted and approved.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Respondent, Karen S. Trueblood, is hereby suspended from the practice of law until such time as she complies with the Hearing Officer's orders compelling discovery.

IT IS ALSO ORDERED that, upon compliance with such discovery, the Respondent shall file with the Clerk of the Supreme Court a statement that she has submitted her responses to the Commission's Discovery Request simultaneously with the submission of her responses to the Commission.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commission shall file a certificate of receipt with the Clerk of the Supreme Court immediately upon receiving the requested response or objections to its discovery requests.

The Clerk of this Court is directed to send notice of this Order as required by Admis.Dise.R. 23, Section 8(d).

All Justices concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1999: 219992026peak 1999 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re the Contempt of the Supreme Court of Indiana of Crenshaw708 N.E.2d 859 (Ind. 1999)
  2. In re Daniel K. Houston711 N.E.2d 33 (Ind. 1999)

Most recent

  1. In re Daniel K. Houston711 N.E.2d 33 (Ind. 1999)
  2. In re the Contempt of the Supreme Court of Indiana of Crenshaw708 N.E.2d 859 (Ind. 1999)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list