TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Application of Marion

Application of Marion, 178 F.2d 401 (9th Cir. 1949)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
December 5, 1949
Docket
No. 149_1
Judges
Denman, Healy, Orr, Per Curiam
Citations
178 F.2d 401

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner herein seeks to proceed forma pauperis in a claimed appeal and for other relief. His petition alleges that he commenced in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada a proceeding seeking a writ of detinue to produce certain records alleged to have been stolen from him and suppressed by the United States Attorney; that District Judge Foley granted petitioner the right to prosecute his action in forma pauperis; that upon Judge Foley’s disqualifying himself, District Judge Lemmon was designated to sit in his place; that a motion to dismiss was filed, which was granted on September 20, 1949; that on September 26, 1949, petitioner sent to the clerk his notice of appeal which was received by the clerk, who refused to file it unless the filing fee of $5.00 was paid.

It is further alleged that on October 7th, Judge Lemmon issued a certificate stating that in his opinion there is no merit to the appeal and that it is not taken in good faith.

Section 1915(a), Title 28 of the Judicial Code provides:

“§ 1915. Proceedings in forma pauperis.

“(a) Any court of the United States may authorize the commencement, prosecution or defense of any suit, action or proceeding, civil or criminal, or appeal therein, without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor, by a citizen who makes affidavit that he is unable to pay such costs or give security therefor. * * * “An appeal may not be taken in forma pauperis if the trial court certifies in writing that it is not taken in good faith.” (Emphasis supplied.)

It is apparent that the giving of a notice of appeal to the clerk was for an appeal forma pauperis. The certificate that it is not taken in good faith requires us to hold that it is not taken within the above provisions of the code, and that we have not the power to grant any relief to the petitioner.

The petition is dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1957: 119572026peak 1957 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list