TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Wjr, the Goodwill Station, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission (Coastal Plains Broadcasting Co., Inc. )

WJR, THE GOODWILL STATION, Inc., v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (COASTAL PLAINS BROADCASTING CO., Inc., Intervenor)

Wjr, the Goodwill Station, Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n (Coastal Plains Broad. Co., Inc. ), 178 F.2d 720 (D.C. Cir. 1949)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
November 7, 1949
Docket
No. 9464
Judges
Stephens, Edgerton, Clark, Miller, Prettyman
Citations
178 F.2d 72085 U.S. App. D.C. 3921949 U.S. App. LEXIS 2570

Opinion — Prettyman

PRETTYMAN, Circuit Judge.

The Supreme Court has directed us to consider the merits of the question raised by appellant’s petition to the Commission for reconsideration of the Coastal Plains application and for leave to participate as a party in that proceeding.

1

The factual content of that petition and the relevant provisions of the Commission’s Rules and Regulations and Standards of Good Engineering Practice are fully described in the opinions already written in the case in this court.

2

There is no necessity for repeating those discussions. In sum, petitioner was shown to have a fight to normal protection, and no more, under its license. It did not allege that, under the permissive provisions of the Regulations, it had applied for or been granted, in respect of either primary or intermittent service, protection beyond the normal contour area as prescribed by the Standards. It did not assert in its petition any threatened impingement upon that area. It is our view, therefore, that upon the allegations of its petition appellant showed no right to intervene in or be made a party to the Coastal Plains proceeding, or to appeal. The action of the Commission in denying the petition was, therefore, correct, and the appeal is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

1

. Federal Communications Comm’n v. WJR, the Goodwill Station, 1949, 337 U.S. 265 , 69 S.Ct. 1097 , 93 L.Ed. —.

2

. 1948, 84 U.S.App.D.C. 1 , 174 F.2d 226 .

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1949: 11954: 11963: 21964: 11965: 11972: 119492026peak 1963 · 2

Most recent

  1. George R. Cogar v. William E. Schuyler, Jr., Commissioner of Patents, and Sperry Rand Corporation464 F.2d 747 (D.C. Cir. 1972)
  2. Pan American-Grace Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Master Executive Councils of Pilots of Braniff Airways, Inc., and Pan American-Grace Airways, Inc., Lufthansa German Airlines and Pan American World Airways, Inc.342 F.2d 905 (D.C. Cir. 1965)
  3. Pan American-Grace Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board342 F.2d 905 (D.C. Cir. 1964)
  4. Interstate Broadcasting Company, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Patchogue Broadcasting Company, Inc.323 F.2d 797 (D.C. Cir. 1963)
  5. Interstate Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission323 F.2d 797 (D.C. Cir. 1963)
  6. Harbenito Broadcasting Co., Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission218 F.2d 28 (D.C. Cir. 1954)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n v. WJR, Goodwill Station, Inc., 337 U.S. 265 (1949) 229
WJR, the Goodwill Station, Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 174 F.2d 226 (D.C. Cir. 1948) 17

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list