TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Lewis v. Burke, Extr.

George C. Lewis v. Myers Burke, Executor of Estate of Copeland

Lewis v. Burke, Extr., 277 N.E.2d 161 (Ind. 1972)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Indiana Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 12, 1972
Docket
No. 172S5
Judges
Prentice
Citations
277 N.E.2d 161257 Ind. 5971972 Ind. LEXIS 633

Opinion — Prentice

PRENTICE, J.

This cause is before us upon praecipe of Defendant (Petitioner) and the resultant notice from the Clerk of the Switzerland Circuit Court advising of the withdrawal of submission and requesting us to appoint a special judge by reason of the undue delay of the trial judge in ruling upon Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss; and it is now so docketed for determination under Trial Rule 53.2 (A).

Said notice and the praecipe therefor disclose that the petitioner’s motion to dismiss was filed and argued on December 1, 1970, and fully briefed and taken under advisement on January 29, 1971. It is further disclosed that said judge held said matter under advisement until June 30, 1971, upon which day said motion was overruled. Petitioner’s praecipe was filed with the Clerk of the Switzerland Circuit Court on November 5,1971.

We have recently passed upon similar questions arising under T.R. 53.1 (A) and determined that affirmative action by counsel or the Clerk is a prerequisite to the operation of said rule.

Jolly v. Modisett (1971), 257 Ind. 426 , 275 N. E. 2d 780 ;

Raisor v. Kelly (1971), Ind., 275 N. E. 2d 542 .

Petitioner’s motion should have been ruled upon within thirty days from submission, and the trial judge was subject to removal on and after February 29, 1971. However, no affirmative action having been taken as prescribed in Jolly v. Modisett, supra, and Raisor v. Kelly, supra, the jurisdiction of the trial judge continued and was operative on the date of his ruling.

*599 Accordingly, the withdrawal of submission is hereby set aside, and the jurisdiction of the trial judge is continued.

Arterburn, C.J., and Givan and Hunter, JJ., concur; De-Bruler, J., dissents.

Note. — Reported in 277 N. E. 2d 161 .

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1978: 11981: 11984: 21994: 119782026peak 1984 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Misner v. Presdorf421 N.E.2d 684 (Ind. Ct. App. 1981)
  2. Hepp v. Pierce460 N.E.2d 186 (Ind. Ct. App. 1984)
  3. Unishops, Inc. v. May's Family Centers, Inc.375 N.E.2d 1135 (Ind. Ct. App. 1978)
  4. Weber v. Electrostatic Engineering, Inc.465 N.E.2d 1152 (Ind. Ct. App. 1984)
  5. State ex rel. Corll v. Wabash Circuit Court631 N.E.2d 914 (Ind. 1994)

Most recent

  1. State ex rel. Corll v. Wabash Circuit Court631 N.E.2d 914 (Ind. 1994)
  2. Weber v. Electrostatic Engineering, Inc.465 N.E.2d 1152 (Ind. Ct. App. 1984)
  3. Hepp v. Pierce460 N.E.2d 186 (Ind. Ct. App. 1984)
  4. Misner v. Presdorf421 N.E.2d 684 (Ind. Ct. App. 1981)
  5. Unishops, Inc. v. May's Family Centers, Inc.375 N.E.2d 1135 (Ind. Ct. App. 1978)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Jolly v. Modisett, 275 N.E.2d 780 (Ind. 1971) 28
Raisor v. Kelly, 275 N.E.2d 542 (Ind. 1971) 5

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list