Ring Engineering Co. v. Otis Elevator Co.
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
This case involves interpretation of a contract for installing elevators in an office building in Washington, D. C. We agree with the District Court’s interpretation. Furthermore, appellant may not overturn a summary judgment by raising here an issue of fact that was not plainly disclosed as a genuine issue in the trial court. Fletcher v. Krise, 73 App.D.C. 266 , 120 F.2d 809 ; Williams v. Kolb, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 253 , 145 F.2d 344 . Garrett Biblical Institute v. American University, 82 U.S.App.D.C., 265 , 163 F.2d 265 , is not to the contrary.
Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.