TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Mrs. Walter Lane Smith v. United States

Mrs. Walter Lane SMITH, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

Smith v. United States, 180 F.2d 357 (6th Cir. 1950)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
February 14, 1950
Docket
No. 10903
Judges
Simons, Allen, Miller
Citations
180 F.2d 357

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was heard upon the record, briefs and argument of respective counsel;

And the Court being of the opinion that the findings of fact by the District Judge are supported by the evidence and are not clearly erroneous, and that there is no error in his conclusions of law based thereon, 85 F.Supp. 838 ; Lazier v. United States, 8 Cir., 170 F.2d 521 ; Sic v. Commissioner, 8 Cir., 177 F.2d 469 ; Pettit v. Commissioner, 5 Cir., 175 F.2d 195 ; Baruch v. Commissioner, 11 T.C. 96 , affirmed, 2 Cir., 178 F.2d 402 .

It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1951: 11952: 11953: 11954: 21956: 11957: 119512026peak 1954 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Koshland208 F.2d 636 (9th Cir. 1954)
  2. Weill v. Commissioner17 T.C. 318 (Tax Ct. 1951)
  3. Burns v. Commissioner21 T.C. 857 (Tax Ct. 1954)
  4. Puente v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue199 F.2d 940 (9th Cir. 1952)
  5. CLuck v. Commissioner29 T.C. 7 (Tax Ct. 1957)
  6. Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. United States111 F. Supp. 314 (N.D. Ill. 1953)

Most recent

  1. CLuck v. Commissioner29 T.C. 7 (Tax Ct. 1957)
  2. Rothbart v. Commissioner26 T.C. 680 (Tax Ct. 1956)
  3. Burns v. Commissioner21 T.C. 857 (Tax Ct. 1954)
  4. United States v. Koshland208 F.2d 636 (9th Cir. 1954)
  5. Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. United States111 F. Supp. 314 (N.D. Ill. 1953)
  6. Puente v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue199 F.2d 940 (9th Cir. 1952)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 5

DepthCaseCited by
Lazier v. United States, 170 F.2d 521 (8th Cir. 1948) 33
Sic v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 177 F.2d 469 (8th Cir. 1949) 23
Baruch v. Comm'r, 11 T.C. 96 (Tax Ct. 1948) 20
Pettit v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 175 F.2d 195 (5th Cir. 1949) 18
Smith v. United States, 85 F. Supp. 838 (W.D. Tenn. 1948) 8

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list