TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Taylor v. United States

Taylor v. United States, 180 F.2d 1020 (9th Cir. 1950)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 23, 1950
Docket
No. 12453_1
Judges
Stephens, Healy, Bone
Citations
180 F.2d 1020

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from the district court’s order denying appellant’s motion to correct and reduce his claimed illegal sentence. Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the issues presented have heretofore been adjudicated by this court. It appears that the only genuine issue raised on this appeal concerns the sufficiency of the indictment under which appellant was convicted and sentenced upon his plea of guilty. In Taylor v. Squier, 9 Cir., 179 F.2d 640 (rehearing denied February 9, 1950), we held that the indictment sufficiently charged a violation of 26 U.S. C. A. § 145(b).

Appellant contends that this appeal raises other and new issues which were not presented on his former appeals. Taylor here presents lengthy arguments which are a mere repetition of arguments made on previous appeals. They are entirely devoid of merit. They are neither “new” nor do they present justiciable issues.

Appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal is granted.

Appeal dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1950: 11962: 11963: 119502026peak 1950 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Alphonse Warren v. United States311 F.2d 673 (8th Cir. 1963)
  2. Tom Don Franano v. United States303 F.2d 470 (8th Cir. 1962)
  3. Taylor v. United States182 F.2d 473 (9th Cir. 1950)

Most recent

  1. Alphonse Warren v. United States311 F.2d 673 (8th Cir. 1963)
  2. Tom Don Franano v. United States303 F.2d 470 (8th Cir. 1962)
  3. Taylor v. United States182 F.2d 473 (9th Cir. 1950)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Taylor v. United States, 179 F.2d 640 (9th Cir. 1950) 52

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list