TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United Services Life Ins. Co. v. Bischoff

United Servs. Life Ins. Co. v. Bischoff, 181 F.2d 627 (D.C. Cir. 1950)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
April 10, 1950
Docket
No. 10083_1
Judges
Clark, Edgerton, Washington
Citations
181 F.2d 62786 U.S. App. D.C. 3281950 U.S. App. LEXIS 2669

Opinion — Edgerton

EDGERTON, Circuit Judge.

The insurance company appeals from a judgment for the beneficiary in a suit on a policy. The insured, an army captain, , was killed in action piloting a fighter plane. “Captain Bisc.hoff was the pilot and sole occupant of a P-38 type aircraft which was engaged in a strafing mission on 10 June 1944. He flew down to strafe a locomotive and the right wing of his plane came in contact with the locomotive as. he banked away. * * * [The plane] crashed and burned * * *. The remains of the pilot were recovered and buried.”

The policy in suit, like that in Boye v. United Services Life Ins. Co., 83 U.S.App.D.C. 306 , 168 F.2d 570 , limits recovery (with irrelevant exceptions) to premiums paid if death is “due to operating or riding in any kind of aircraft * * *; any provision in this Policy to the contrary notwithstanding.” Risks of war are not excepted from this general aviation exclusion clause. Since the exclusion is unqualified it applies equally to all risks, whether of war or of peace, that result from operating or riding in airplanes.- Accordingly there can be no recovery in this suit. It is immaterial that the policy is declared to be “free from restrictions as to residence, travel, occupation, or military or. naval service.” This latter clause means among other things that the policy does not exclude all war risks. It does not mean that the policy covers all war risks.

Reversed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1951: 11952: 11954: 11955: 21972: 119512026peak 1955 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Hawkins v. STATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY366 F. Supp. 1031 (E.D. Tenn. 1972)
  2. Wilmington Trust Co. v. Travelers Insurance125 F. Supp. 520 (D. Del. 1954)
  3. Coates v. Potomac Electric Power Co.95 F. Supp. 779 (D.D.C. 1951)
  4. Littlefield v. Littlefield194 F.2d 695 (10th Cir. 1952)
  5. Southland Life Insurance Co. v. Trahan284 S.W.2d 207 (Tex. App. 1955)
  6. Moore v. United States129 F. Supp. 456 (N.D. Cal. 1955)

Most recent

  1. Hawkins v. STATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY366 F. Supp. 1031 (E.D. Tenn. 1972)
  2. Southland Life Insurance Co. v. Trahan284 S.W.2d 207 (Tex. App. 1955)
  3. Moore v. United States129 F. Supp. 456 (N.D. Cal. 1955)
  4. Wilmington Trust Co. v. Travelers Insurance125 F. Supp. 520 (D. Del. 1954)
  5. Littlefield v. Littlefield194 F.2d 695 (10th Cir. 1952)
  6. Coates v. Potomac Electric Power Co.95 F. Supp. 779 (D.D.C. 1951)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Boye v. United Servs. Life Ins., 168 F.2d 570 (D.C. Cir. 1948) 8

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list