TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

People v. Lackaye

The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, vs. Harvey M. Lackaye, Plaintiff in Error

People v. Lackaye, 116 N.E.2d 359 (Ill. 1953)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Illinois Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 18, 1953
Docket
No. 32886
Judges
Bristow
Citations
116 N.E.2d 3591 Ill. 2d 6181953 Ill. LEXIS 457

Opinion — Bristow

Mr. Justice Bristow delivered the opinion of the court:

This cause reaches this court on a writ of error to review the judgment of the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, affirming the judgment and sentence of the plaintiff in error by the municipal court of the city of Chicago to a term of thirty days in the House of Correction for the crime of unlawfully and wickedly keeping and maintaining a house of ill fame or a place for the practice of lewdness.

The information, omitting the formal parts, charges, “did then and there unlawfully and wickedly keep or maintain a house of ill fame or place for the practice of lewdness and did let rooms for such purpose.” The relevant part of the statute (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1951, chap. 38, par. 162,) allegedly infringed reads as follows: “Whoever keeps or maintains a house of ill fame or place for the practice of prostitution or lewdness, or whoever patronizes the same, or lets any house, room or other premises for any such purpose, or shall keep a common, ill governed and disorderly house, to the encouragement of idleness, gaming, drinking, fornication or other misbehavior, shall be fined not exceeding two hundred dollars, or imprisoned in the county jail or house of correction for a period of not more than one year or both.”

The plaintiff in error contends here, as he did in the Appellate Court, that the keeping of a bath house where men congregate for homosexual pleasures, one with the other, is not within the purview of the above statutory prohibition; that said section of the statute was designed to create an offense which would punish only the keeper of premises in which women engaged in illicit sexual intercourse with men.

These contentions were considered and disposed of by the Appellate Court, 348 Ill. App. 542 , and we adopt the opinion of that court as the opinion of this court.

Judgment affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

1959: 11972: 11974: 11975: 11976: 11979: 11983: 119592026peak 1959 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Harris v. United States315 A.2d 569 (D.C. 1974)
  2. City of Chicago v. Geraci332 N.E.2d 487 (Ill. App. Ct. 1975)
  3. Harris v. United States293 A.2d 851 (D.C. 1972)
  4. State ex rel. Wayne County Prosecuting Attorney v. Levenburg280 N.W.2d 810 (Mich. 1979)
  5. State ex rel. Wayne County Prosecutor v. Diversified Theatrical Corp.240 N.W.2d 460 (Mich. 1976)
  6. STATE ex rel. MACOMB COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY v. MESK333 N.W.2d 184 (Mich. Ct. App. 1983)

Most recent

  1. STATE ex rel. MACOMB COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY v. MESK333 N.W.2d 184 (Mich. Ct. App. 1983)
  2. State ex rel. Wayne County Prosecuting Attorney v. Levenburg280 N.W.2d 810 (Mich. 1979)
  3. State ex rel. Wayne County Prosecutor v. Diversified Theatrical Corp.240 N.W.2d 460 (Mich. 1976)
  4. City of Chicago v. Geraci332 N.E.2d 487 (Ill. App. Ct. 1975)
  5. Harris v. United States315 A.2d 569 (D.C. 1974)
  6. Harris v. United States293 A.2d 851 (D.C. 1972)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
People v. Lackaye, 109 N.E.2d 390 (Ill. App. Ct. 1952) 9

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list