TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Psaty & Fuhrman, Inc. v. Stimson, Secretary of War

PSATY & FUHRMAN, Inc., v. STIMSON, Secretary of War, Et Al.

Psaty & Fuhrman, Inc. v. Stimson, Sec'y of War, 182 F.2d 985 (D.C. Cir. 1950)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 22, 1950
Docket
No. 10156_1
Judges
Prettyman, Bazelon, Fahy
Citations
182 F.2d 98587 U.S. App. D.C. 471950 U.S. App. LEXIS 3732

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, on March 16, 1942, entered into a contract with the Government for the construction of a hospital. The Secretary of War renegotiated the contract on a completed contract basis and, on February 7, 1944, made a unilateral determination that petitioner had excessive profits of $700,000. Petitioner applied to the Tax Court for a determination that the renegotiation of its contract must be upon a fiscal (which in this case was calendar) year basis. The Tax Court supported the Secretary.

It is now settled that a question such as the one here before us, being neither constitutional nor jurisdictional, is one which the Tax Court under the statute, 50 U.S.C. A.Appendix § 1191, has exclusive and final jurisdiction to determine.

1

.The petition must, therefore, he Dismissed.

1

. Lichtor v. United States, 1948, 334 U.S. 742 , 68 S.Ct. 1294 , 92 L.Ed. 1694 ; Aircraft & Diesel Equipment Corp. v. Hirsch, 1947, 331 U.S. 752 , 67 S.Ct. 1493 , 91 L.Ed. 1796 ; Macauley v. Waterman S. S. Corp., 1946, 327 U.S. 540 , 66 S.Ct. 712 , 90 L.Ed. 839 ; Ring Const. Corporation v. Secretary of War of U. S., 1949, 85 U.S.App.D.C. 386 , 178 F.2d 714 , certiorari denied, 1950, 339 U.S. 943 , 70 S. Ct. 796 ; Eastern Machinery Company v. Under Secretary of War, 1950, 86 U.S. App.D.C. —, 182 F.2d 99 ; Blanchard Mach. Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp., 1949, 85 U.S.App.D.C. 361 , 177 F.2d 727 , certiorari denied, 1950, 339 U.S, 912, 70 S.Ct. 571 ; U. S. Electrical Motors v. Jones, 1946, 80 U.S.App.D.C. 329 , 153 F.2d 134 .

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 13 cases

View all citing references →
1952: 11953: 41954: 31955: 21961: 11967: 11975: 119522026peak 1953 · 4

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 7

DepthCaseCited by
Aircraft & Diesel Equip. Corp. v. Hirsch, 331 U.S. 752 (1947) 336
MacAuley v. Waterman S.S. Corp., 327 U.S. 540 (1946) 173
Lichter v. United States, 334 U.S. 742 (1948) 382
U. S. Elec. Motors, Inc. v. Jones, 153 F.2d 134 (D.C. Cir. 1946) 24
Ring Const. Corp. v. Sec'y of War of United States, 178 F.2d 714 (D.C. Cir. 1949) 19
Blanchard Mach. Co. v. Reconstruction Fin. Corp., 177 F.2d 727 (D.C. Cir. 1949) 18
Eastern MacHinery Co. v. Under Sec'y of War, 182 F.2d 99 (D.C. Cir. 1950) 9

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list