TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Burlington Mills Corporation v. Roy Fabrics, Inc.

Burlington Mills Corp. v. Roy Fabrics, Inc., 182 F.2d 1020 (2d Cir. 1950)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
June 19, 1950
Docket
No. 21705_1
Citations
182 F.2d 102086 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 4261950 U.S. App. LEXIS 2895

Opinion

182 F.2d 1020

BURLINGTON MILLS CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ROY FABRICS, Inc., et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 249.

Docket 21705.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued June 19, 1950.

Decided June 19, 1950.

Before AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and FRANK, Circuit Judges, and GODDARD, District Judge.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Abraham Wilson and Kadel & Wilson, New York City, for defendants-appellants.

Leon Lauterstein, and Lauterstein & Lauterstein, New York City, for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

1

Order D.C., 91 F.Supp. 39 , affirmed in open court.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1950: 119502026peak 1950 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Stahly, Inc. v. M. H. Jacobs 0co.183 F.2d 914 (7th Cir. 1950)

Most recent

  1. Stahly, Inc. v. M. H. Jacobs 0co.183 F.2d 914 (7th Cir. 1950)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Burlington Mills Corp. v. Fabrics, 91 F. Supp. 39 (S.D.N.Y. 1950) 19

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list