TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Park-In Theatres v. Paramount-Richards Theatres

Park-In Theatres, Inc. v. Paramount-Richards Theatres, Inc., Paramount-Richards Enterprises, Inc., Kennington-Richards Enterprises, Inc., Richards-Ehrlich Enterprises, Inc., Saenger Theatres of Texas, Inc., Capital Theatres, Inc., United Theatres, Inc

Park-In Theatres v. Paramount-Richards Theatres, 185 F.2d 407 (3d Cir. 1951)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
January 24, 1951
Docket
No. 10243
Citations
185 F.2d 407

Opinion

185 F.2d 407

PARK-IN THEATRES, Inc., Appellant v. PARAMOUNT-RICHARDS THEATRES, Inc., Paramount-Richards Enterprises, Inc., Kennington-Richards Enterprises, Inc., Richards-Ehrlich Enterprises, Inc., Saenger Theatres of Texas, Inc., Capital Theatres, Inc., United Theatres, Inc.

No. 10243.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued November 17, 1950.

Decided December 13, 1950.

Rehearing Denied January 24, 1951.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware; Richard Seymour Rodney, Judge.

Leonard L. Kalish, Philadelphia, Pa., Arthur G. Connolly, Wilmington, Del., for appellant.

Charles R. Fenwick, Washington, D. C., William S. Potter, Wilmington, Del. (James L. Latchum, Wilmington, Del., Thomas B. Van Poole, Jr., Washington, D. C., on the brief), for appellees.

Before MARIS, McLAUGHLIN and STALEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

This is an appeal from two orders of the district court. The first, entered May 1, 1950, dismissed the amended complaint as to two Louisiana defendants for want of proper venue and the second, entered May 31, 1950, granted defendants' motion for summary judgment as to the first cause of action stated in the amended complaint and dismissed the third cause of action stated therein. Our examination of the record satisfies us that the actions of the district court here appealed from were right. The reasons for its actions are fully set out in the three opinions filed by Judge Rodney on December 8, 1948, 81 F.Supp. 466 , April 14, 1950, 90 F.Supp. 727 and May 8, 1950, 90 F.Supp. 730 , with which we are in accord. It will serve no useful purpose to add to what is there so adequately stated.

2

The orders of the district court will be affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1975: 119752026peak 1975 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Freedman v. Beneficial Corp.406 F. Supp. 917 (D. Del. 1975)

Most recent

  1. Freedman v. Beneficial Corp.406 F. Supp. 917 (D. Del. 1975)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Park-In Theatres, Inc. v. Paramount-Richards Theatres Inc., 90 F. Supp. 727 (D. Del. 1950) 32
Park-In Theatres, Inc. v. Paramount-Richards Theatres, Inc., 81 F. Supp. 466 (D. Del. 1948) 12
Park-In Theatres, Inc. v. Paramount-Richards Theatres, Inc., 90 F. Supp. 730 (D. Del. 1950) 10

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list