TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Rose v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

ROSE Et Al. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

Rose v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 188 F.2d 355 (9th Cir. 1951)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 17, 1951
Docket
No. 12539_1
Judges
Fee, Mathews, Per Curiam, Pope
Citations
188 F.2d 355

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

Petitioners here seek a review of decisions of the Tax Court which determined deficiencies in their federal income taxes, declared value excess-profits taxes, and excess profits taxes for the years 1938 to 1941 inclusive, and which sustained fraud and negligence penalties asserted by the respondent Commissioner.

The matters raised by the briefs and upon the oral argument present nothing but questions of fact. It is sufficient to say that our examination of the record ¡convinces us that the findings of the Tax,Court, including the findings of fraud and negligence, are supported by the evidence. Accordingly the decisions of the Tax Court are affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list