TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Selby v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction

Selby v. Warden of Md. House of Corr., 92 A.2d 756 (Md. 2001)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Maryland · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 19, 2001
Docket
Nos. [H.C. No. 19, October Term, 1952.]
Judges
Markell, Delaplaine, Collins, Henderson
Citations
92 A.2d 756201 Md. 653

Opinion — Delaplaine

Delaplaine, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

Howard F. Selby, who was convicted in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County on the charge of assault with intent to murder and was sentenced to the Maryland House of Correction for the period of five years, applies here for leave to appeal from refusal of a writ of habeas corpus..

Petitioner alleges that he was tried the first time in December, 1950, and the jury were unable to agree; that in December, 1951, his attorney struck out his appearance, and in January, 1952, he requested the Court to appoint counsel for him but his request was denied; that he requested the Court to summon witnesses in his behalf and that request also was denied.

First, petitioner has alleged no facts concerning himself or his case that indicated that appointment of counsel was necessary. The right to appointment of counsel is not an absolute right. It exists only on a showing of facts that make it necessary in the particular case. The burden is on the petitioner to allege facts tending to show that for want of counsel an ingredient of unfairness operated actively in the process that resulted in his confinement.

Williams v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary, 200 Md. 651 , 89 A. 2d 228 ;

Knott v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary, 200 Md. 658 , 90 A. 2d 177 .

Secondly, the allegation that petitioner was denied the right to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor goes only to the regularity of the *655 proceedings, not to the jurisdiction of the trial court. A judgment of conviction is not void for such an error, and the Court of Appeals will not order the discharge of a prisoner for such an error.

Ex parte Harding, 120 U. S. 782 , 7 S. Ct. 780 , 30 L. Ed. 824 .

Application denied, wtih costs.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

2001: 420012026peak 2001 · 4

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Ex Parte Harding, 120 U.S. 782 (1887) 50
Williams v. Warden of Md. Penitentiary, 89 A.2d 228 (Md. 2001) 2
Knott v. Warden of Md. Penitentiary, 90 A.2d 177 (Md. 2001) 2

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list