TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

American Automobile Ins. Co. v. Ryle

Am. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Ryle, 188 F.2d 830 (5th Cir. 1951)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 10, 1951
Docket
No. 13334_1
Judges
Hutcheson, Borah, Russell
Citations
188 F.2d 8301951 U.S. App. LEXIS 3110

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

The suit, brought under the Texas Workmen’s Compensation Act, Vernon’s Ann. Civ.St. art. 8306 et seq., was for damages for the willfull beating of one Francis J. Finney, an employee of Kelly Sales & Coffee Company, which carried workmen’s compensation insurance with the plaintiff.

Defendant, alleging that Finney, the injured employee, was a citizen of Texas, was a joint owner of the cause of action sued on, and was, therefore, an indispensable party, whose joinder would defeat the jurisdiction, moved to dismiss for want of jurisdiction.

The district judge sustained the motion and plaintiff is here appealing from the judgment, insisting that the questions raised below and sought to be raised here are foreclosed against the contention of want of jurisdiction by the decision of this court in Orange Ice, Light & Water Co. v. Texas Comp. Ins. Co., 5 Cir., 278 F. 8 .

Appellee urges upon us that the invoked decision is no longer, authoritative because *831 the Texas Statute has been significantly amended, and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, particularly Rule 19, 28 U.S.C.A. have been adopted since that decision.

We agree with appellant that neither the amendment of the Texas Statute, nor the adoption of the Rules of Civil Procedure have in any way impaired or affected the authority of the Orange Ice, L. & W. Co. case, and that the suit was wrongly dismissed.

The judgment is, therefore, reversed and the cause is remanded for further and not inconsistent proceedings.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1952: 119522026peak 1952 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Dunham v. Robertson198 F.2d 316 (10th Cir. 1952)

Most recent

  1. Dunham v. Robertson198 F.2d 316 (10th Cir. 1952)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Orange Ice v. Tex. Comp. Ins., 278 F. 8 (5th Cir. 1922) 5

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list