TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Humana of Illinois, Inc. v. Heckler

HUMANA OF ILLINOIS, INC. D/B/A Springfield Community Hospital, Plaintiff, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Defendant

Humana of Ill., Inc. v. Heckler, 584 F. Supp. 618 (C.D. Ill. 1984)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court, C.D. Illinois · Federal District Courts
Decided
March 2, 1984
Docket
No. 83-3061
Judges
J. Waldo Ackerman
Citations
584 F. Supp. 6181984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189465 Soc. Serv. Rev. 619

Opinion — Ackerman

*619 ORDER J. WALDO ACKERMAN,. Chief Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. On October 14, 1983, the Court heard oral arguments on the motions. Since that time, numerous district courts throughout the country, including the Honorable Hubert L. Will in the Northern District of Illinois, have ruled on the questions raised by the Plaintiffs in this action. After a review of the briefs and arguments by the respective parties in this action, and a review of the decisions recently rendered by the various district courts throughout the country who have confronted these identical questions, it is my opinion that the regulation promulgated by the Department of Health and Human Services was arbitrary and capricious and does not comport with the requirements of the Medicare statute. In support of this decision, I adopt the opinion of Judge Will in St. James Hospital v. Heckler, 579 F.Supp. 757 (N.D. Ill.1984). As I do not believe that I could add anything substantial to the already well-reasoned decisions of the other district judges in this country, I will not render an additional written decision.

Therefore, Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is granted; Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 13 cases

View all citing references →
1984: 71985: 619842026peak 1984 · 7

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
St. James Hosp. v. Heckler, 579 F. Supp. 757 (N.D. Ill. 1984) 23

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list