TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

MacIllrath v. United States

MacIllrath v. United States, 188 F.2d 1009 (D.C. Cir. 1951)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
March 22, 1951
Docket
No. 10508_1
Judges
Clark, Per Curiam, Prettyman, Proctor
Citations
188 F.2d 100988 U.S. App. D.C. 2701951 U.S. App. LEXIS 3139

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

The question here is whether Rule 31(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 1

required the District Court in a trial for assault with a dangerous weapon 2

to instruct the jury that they might find the defendant guilty of the lesser offense of simple assault. We think not. The rule does not in terms require the instruction. If there is no evidence to justify a verdict of simple assault a jury should not be so instructed. Burcham v. United States, 1947, 82 U.S.App.D.C. 283 , 163 F.2d 761 . To do so would only tend to confuse and mislead the jury.

The defendant was tried upon a three count indictment for separate assaults upon a man and two women. The man was shot in his chest by a pistol in appellant’s hand. Appellant then clubbed the women upon their heads with the pistol, causing lacerations which required sutures and hospital treatment. He claimed that his actions were in self-defense, and, also, that the shooting was accidental. As to both defenses appellant concedes that the jury was “carefully instructed.” Obviously the shooting, if not accidental, was nothing *1010 less than an assault with a dangerous weapon. We also think the pistol used as a club in the violent manner shown by the evidence was still a dangerous weapon. Hickey v. United States, 9

Cir., 1909, 168 F. 536, 538 , 22 L.R.A.,N.S., 728. Serious injury will very likely result from such use of a pistol, and did result in this case. We think the evidence offered no justification for an instruction on simple assault. Burcham v. United States, supra. See also Sparf and Hansen v. United States, 1895, 156 U.S. 51 , 15 S.Ct. 273 , 39 L.Ed. 343 . Moreover, there was no request for such an instruction. Hence, the present assignment of error comes too late. Fed.R.Crim.P. 30; Villaroman v. United States, 1950, 87 U.S.App.D.C.240, 184 F.2d 261 .

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

1

. Rule 31(c), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A. “Conviction of Dess Offense. The defendant may be found guilty of an offense necessarily included in the offense charged or of an attempt to commit either the offense charged or an offense necessarily included therein if the attempt is an offense.”

2

. 22 D.C.Code 1940, § 502. “Every person convicted of an. assault with intent to commit mayhem, or of an assault with a dangerous weapon, shall be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than ten years. (Mar. 3, 1901, 31 Stat. 1321 , ch. 854, § 804.)”

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 10 cases

View all citing references →
1953: 11957: 11959: 11961: 11966: 21967: 21968: 11987: 119532026peak 1966 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Albert B. Brooke v. United States385 F.2d 279 (D.C. Cir. 1967)
  2. James W. Parker v. United States359 F.2d 1009 (D.C. Cir. 1966)
  3. Horace Marion Larson v. United States296 F.2d 80 (10th Cir. 1961)
  4. Gordon Korb Yates v. United States384 F.2d 586 (5th Cir. 1967)
  5. United States v. Leo Strassman241 F.2d 784 (2d Cir. 1957)
  6. Jesse R. Broughman v. United States361 F.2d 71 (D.C. Cir. 1966)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Johnny Tisdale817 F.2d 1552 (11th Cir. 1987)
  2. State v. Mays436 P.2d 482 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1968)
  3. Gordon Korb Yates v. United States384 F.2d 586 (5th Cir. 1967)
  4. Albert B. Brooke v. United States385 F.2d 279 (D.C. Cir. 1967)
  5. Jesse R. Broughman v. United States361 F.2d 71 (D.C. Cir. 1966)
  6. James W. Parker v. United States359 F.2d 1009 (D.C. Cir. 1966)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Sparf v. United States, 156 U.S. 51 (1895) 599
Burcham v. United States, 163 F.2d 761 (D.C. Cir. 1947) 14
Villaroman v. United States, 184 F.2d 261 (D.C. Cir. 1950) 84
Hickey v. United States, 168 F. 536 (9th Cir. 1909) 9

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list