Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. United States Guarantee Co
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. United States Guarantee Co.
Opinion
CHASE, Circuit Judge.
The issues now before us are, as the parties agree, the same in principle as those considered in Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. General Reinsurance Corporation, 2 Cir., 190 F.2d 148 , the opinion in which is handed down herewith. They are, whether in computing the net taxable income of the respondent for 1942 the so-called “Convention Form” should be followed precisely in computing the amount deductible from gross income for “losses incurred,” and whether it should be followed in the same way in computing the allowable deductions for “losses incurred” for the years 1936 to 1939 inclusive in determining the amount of the base-period excess profits credit to which the respondent is entitled in the computation of its excess, profits tax for 1942.
The respondent, a New York corporation, is an insurance company having its principal office in the City of New York and is taxable in accordance with the provisions of § 204 of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. § 204 . It followed the “Convention Form” strictly in reporting its regular and excess profits tax income-for 1942, with the result that, in computing the credit allowable for “losses incurred” under subdivision (6) of sec. 204 (b), it included an amount for unpaid losses determined, in accordance with the regulations of the Insurance Department of New York, on the so-called “statutory basis” method. This method requires that unpaid liability and workmen’s compensation losses be returned at the higher of two figures: the actual total estimated liability on all outstanding claims, called the “case-method” figure, or such an estimate adjusted by the addition of certain fixed percentages of premiums earned on such risks less losses and expenses paid. The Commissioner determined a deficiency in the respondent’s excess profits taxes for that year by computing unpaid losses on the “case method,” that is, by employing the-actual appraisals of the claims, in accordance with the provision of Treasury Regulations, 111, Sec. 29.204-2, that “In computing ‘losses incurred’ the determination of unpaid losses at the close of each year- *153 must represent actual unpaid losses as nearly as it is possible to acertain them.” The decision of the Tax Court expunging the deficiency was in accord with its decision in Commissioner v. General Reinsurance Corporation, supra, and for the reasons stated in our opinion in that case we think it should be reversed.
Decision reversed and cause remanded with directions to reinstate the deficiency.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Gerling International Insurance Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Appeal of Gerling International Insurance Co
- Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. Commissioner
- Standard Oil Company (New Jersey) v. United States
- The Western Casualty And Surety Company v. Commissioner Of Internal Revenue
- The Title Guarantee Company v. The United States
Most recent
- Gerling International Insurance Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Appeal of Gerling International Insurance Co
- The Western Casualty And Surety Company v. Commissioner Of Internal Revenue
- Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. Commissioner
- The Title Guarantee Company v. The United States
- Standard Oil Company (New Jersey) v. United States
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.