TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Friedman v. United States

Friedman v. United States, 190 F.2d 364 (6th Cir. 1951)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
June 1, 1951
Docket
No. 11325_1
Judges
Hicks, Allen, Miller
Citations
190 F.2d 3641951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2427

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

This case came on to be heard upon the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel.

And it appearing that the indictment, although loosely drawn and not to be commended, contains the elements of the offense intended to be charged and fairly apprises the appellant of the 'charges against him. Hagner v. United States, 285 U.S. 427, 431, 433 , 52 S.Ct. 417 , 76 L.Ed. 861 .

And it appearing that jury trial was waived and the case was tried to the court, and that sufficient evidence was presented to support the finding of the court that the letter addressed by the appellant to- *365 the prosecuting witness constituted a violation of § 873, 18 U.S.C.

It is ordered that the judgment be, and it hereby is, affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1964: 119642026peak 1964 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Smith228 F. Supp. 345 (E.D. La. 1964)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Smith228 F. Supp. 345 (E.D. La. 1964)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Hagner v. United States, 285 U.S. 427 (1932) 872

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list