TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

William Hightower v. United States

Hightower v. United States, 193 F.2d 40 (D.C. Cir. 1951)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
November 29, 1951
Docket
No. 10920
Citations
193 F.2d 4090 U.S. App. D.C. 4201951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2861

Opinion

193 F.2d 40 90 U.S.App.D.C. 420

William HIGHTOWER, Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 10920.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued June 14, 1951. Decided Nov. 29, 1951.

Saul G. Lichtenberg, Washington, D.C., with whom Joseph Asper, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellant.

Joseph M. Howard, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom George Morris Fay, U.S. Atty., at the time the brief was filed, and John D. Lane and Frank H. Strickler, Asst. U.S. Attys., all of Washington, D.C., were on the brief for appellee. Charles M. Irelan, appointed U.S. Atty. subsequent to the argument in this case, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, CLARK, and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

The judgment is affirmed. United States v. Carignan, 72 S.Ct. 97 ; Tyler v. United States, 89 U.S.App.D.C.- , 193 F.2d 24 .

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
United States v. Carignan, 342 U.S. 36 (1951) 170
Tyler v. United States, 193 F.2d 24 (D.C. Cir. 1952) 61

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list