TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Warner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Warner v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 193 F.2d 328 (2d Cir. 1952)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
January 3, 1952
Docket
No. 21991_1
Judges
Chase, Clark, Frank, Per Curiam
Citations
193 F.2d 32841 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 4741952 U.S. App. LEXIS 4231

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

The sole question presented is whether the fair market value of 15,000 shares o'f the common stock of Warner Brothers Pictures, Inc., which the petitioner transferred in trust on May 23, 1946 as a gift to one of her daughters and 5000 shares of the same kind of stock which she transferred in the same way as a gift to another daughter was determined by the Tax Court by taking into consideration all of the factors relevant to such a determination.

The petitioner reported the gifts for tax purposes as having a value of $48.00 per share. The Commissioner increased the value to $49.875 per share which was the mean market value on May 23, 1946 as reflected by sales on the New York Stock Exchange on that day. The Tax Court affirmed the determination of the Commissioner.

The principal contention of the petitioner is that the so-called “blockage” rule was not given due effect in the light of the number of shares involved and the condition of the market for the stock on, or about, the gift date. That is, of course, one of the factors to be taken into account but it is only one of them. Richardson v. Commissioner, 2 Cir., 151 F.2d 102 . Possible secondary distribution is one of the others. Bull v. Smith, 2 Cir., 119 F.2d 490 . This valuation was based upon substantial, though in part conflicting evidence to which the Tax Court apparently gave due weight without disregarding the “blockage” rule. Its determination under such circumstances should not be set aside as clearly erroneous. See, Maytag v. Commissioner, 10 Cir., 187 F.2d 962 .

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1953: 11975: 219532026peak 1975 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Richardson v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 151 F.2d 102 (2d Cir. 1945) 35
Maytag v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 187 F.2d 962 (10th Cir. 1951) 19
Bull v. Smith, 119 F.2d 490 (2d Cir. 1941) 18

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list