Gelzhiser v. Fisher
Gelzhiser, Appellant, v. Fisher
Opinion
Opinion by Mr. Chief Justice Bell, Plaintiff, Oliver Gelzhiser, filed a complaint in assumpsit against J. Homer Fisher, Bernard L. Stoecklein and George F. Stoecklein d/b/a Penn Lincoln Memorial Park. At the conclusion of the testimony, the lower Court directed verdicts for the defendants. Plaintiff filed a motion for a new trial, which was denied, Judgment was never entered on the verdicts.
*89 Plaintiff appealed to this Court “from the lower Court’s Opinion and Decree dismissing the motion for a new trial.”
In Denmon v. Rhodes, 416 Pa. 568 , 207 A. 2d 860 , we said: “As stated in the footnote in Menyo v. Sphar, 409 Pa. 223, 224 , 186 A. 2d 9 : “loo many members of the Bar mistakenly believe that the appeal is from an Order which dismissed their motion for a new trial, instead of from a judgment which was entered on the verdict: Simpson v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, 384 Pa. 335 , 121 A. 2d 84 . Compare also Hazle Township Supervisors’ Appeal, 406 Pa. 641 , 180 A. 2d 232 .’ ”
This appeal must be quashed because it was not taken from a judgment. The record is remanded to the Court of Common Pleas of Westmoreland County without prejudice to the right to enter a judgment on the verdicts.
Appeal quashed and record remanded.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.