Shaffer Terminals, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
SHAFFER TERMINALS, Inc., Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Shaffer Terminals, Inc. v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 194 F.2d 539 (9th Cir. 1952)
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
This case is affirmed for the reasons given by the Tax Court. 16 T.C. 356 . Consult also subsequently decided cases of Armston Co. v. C. I. R., 5 Cir., 188 F.2d 531 , and White v. Fitzpatrick, 2 Cir., 193 F.2d 398 .
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 8 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Sun Properties, Inc. v. United States
- Cirelli v. Commissioner
- C. P. And Helen Brooke v. United States
- Kirschenmann v. Westover
- Boyce v. United States
- Adeline Kirschenmann v. Harry C. Westover, United States Collector of Internal Revenue for the Sixth District of California, Henry Kirschenmann v. Harry C. Westover, United States Collector of Internal Revenue for the Sixth District of California
Most recent
- W.B. Lasher Co. v. Commissioner
- Cirelli v. Commissioner
- Carroll v. Commissioner
- C. P. And Helen Brooke v. United States
- Boyce v. United States
- Adeline Kirschenmann v. Harry C. Westover, United States Collector of Internal Revenue for the Sixth District of California, Henry Kirschenmann v. Harry C. Westover, United States Collector of Internal Revenue for the Sixth District of California
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.