Commonwealth v. Holcomb
Commonwealth v. Holcomb, Appellant
Opinion
OPINION PER CURIAM:
Appellant’s brief being so defective as to be useless to the Court, the appeal is quashed in accordance with Pennsylvania Rule of Appellate Procedure 2101. See also, Rule 2118, Pa.R.A.P., and Commonwealth v. Wyant, 254 Pa.Super. 464 , 386 A.2d 43 (1978). The prothonotary is directed to send a copy of this order directly to appellant.
JACOBS, P. J., and SPAETH, J., would affirm.
WATKINS, former P. J., and HOFFMAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 7 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.