TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

William H. Banks Warehouses, Inc., a Corporation, and John Alfred Halford v. George L. Watt

William H. BANKS WAREHOUSES, Inc., a Corporation, and John Alfred Halford, Appellants, v. George L. WATT Et Al., Appellees

William H. Banks Warehouses, Inc. v. Watt, 196 F.2d 1018 (9th Cir. 1952)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
June 19, 1952
Docket
No. 13112_1
Judges
Mathews, Healy, Bone
Citations
196 F.2d 1018

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a judgment in two consolidated actions — an action by William H. Banks Warehouses, Inc., and John Alfred Halford against W. Andrew Jean and others and an action by George L. Watt and others against William H. Banks Warehouses, Inc., and Underwriters at Lloyd’s (London). On the grounds and for the reasons stated in the District Court’s opinion, 96 F.Supp. 731 , the judgment is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1953: 119532026peak 1953 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. William H. Banks Warehouses, Inc. v. George L. Watt205 F.2d 44 (9th Cir. 1953)

Most recent

  1. William H. Banks Warehouses, Inc. v. George L. Watt205 F.2d 44 (9th Cir. 1953)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
William H. Banks Warehouses, Inc. v. Jean, 96 F. Supp. 731 (D. Idaho 1951) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list