Joseph A. Ross v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company
Joseph A. ROSS v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
An examination of the record discloses substantial evidence of negligence to sustain the jury’s verdict against the defendant. Blair v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., 323 U.S. 600, 604 , 65 S.Ct. 545 , 89 L.Ed. 490 . Cf. Lukon v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 3 Cir., 131 F.2d 327, 328 . The evidence also shows that the plaintiff’s act was not the sole efficient cause of the injury. A careful examination of the record and review of the briefs and oral argument convince us that the court below committed no prejudicial error. Consequently the judgment will be affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.