In re Special Investigation No. 229
In Re: Special Investigation No. 229
Opinion
Per Curiam:
This is yet another case involving the accountant-client privilege. See In Re Special Investigation No. 236, 295 Md. 573 , 458 A.2d 75 (1983), for a case argued the same day. This proceeding also involves the investigation by the Attorney General into Medicaid fraud. A subpoena was laid in the *585 hands of an accountant. Those whose papers were affected sought and obtained an order of the Criminal Court of Baltimore quashing the subpoena on the grounds of the accountant-client privilege. The Attorney General appealed to the Court of Special Appeals. On our own motion we issued a writ of certiorari prior to hearing in the latter court.
This appeal must be dismissed. The term of the grand jury in question has expired. No effort was made to have the grand jury continued beyond its term. Thus, if we were to reverse in this proceeding there would be no one to whom the subpoena would be returnable. See In Re Special Investigation No. 195, 295 Md. 276 , 454 A.2d 843 (1983).
Appeal dismissed; appellant to pay the costs.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 6 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.