TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Drown v. United States Pharmacopoeial Convention

DROWN v. UNITED STATES PHARMACOPOEIAL CONVENTION Et Al.

Drown v. United States Pharmacopoeial Convention, 198 F.2d 470 (9th Cir. 1952)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
July 28, 1952
Docket
No. 13447
Judges
Mathews, Bone, Orr
Citations
198 F.2d 4701952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3192

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Ruth B. Drown, brought an action against appellees, The United States Pharmacopoeial Convention, American Medical Association, and Medical Society, State of California, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. A summons was issued and served on appellees. Service on the Convention and the Association was made outside the Southern District of California and outside the State of California. Appellees moved to dismiss the action and, in the alternative, to quash the service of summons; on the Convention and the Association.. The District Court heard the motion and, on May 27, 1952, entered an order, improperly called a judgment, quashing the service of summons on the Convention and the Association and dismissing the complaint, but not dismissing the action, as to Medical Society, State of California, and granting" appellant 20 days from May 26, 1952, in which to fi'e an amended complaint. Instead of filing an amended complaint, appellant appealed from the order on June 4,. 1952. The order was not a final decision,, within the meaning of 28 U.S.C.A. § 1291 , and was not appealable. Therefore the-appeal is dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1954: 11956: 119542026peak 1954 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Youpe v. Moses213 F.2d 613 (D.C. Cir. 1954)
  2. California Brewing Co. v. Red Star Yeast & Products Co.19 F.R.D. 179 (N.D. Cal. 1956)

Most recent

  1. California Brewing Co. v. Red Star Yeast & Products Co.19 F.R.D. 179 (N.D. Cal. 1956)
  2. Youpe v. Moses213 F.2d 613 (D.C. Cir. 1954)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list