Diamond v. Diamond
Diamond, Appellant, v. Diamond
Opinion
Opinion bx Ms. Justice Arnold, On preliminary objections the court below dismissed the plaintiff’s bill in equity and she appeals.
At the instance of the wife the bill, in plain language, seeks to enjoin her husband, Leonard Diamond, from committing adultery with Gussie Stein, and also to restrain Dorothy Lerner, who is alleged to have been an aider and abettor of the principal defendant’s acts.
While it may be convenient to restrain the errant spouse, nevertheless it is without authority under the law of Pennsylvania.
In the first place, equity will not enjoin the commission of a crime:
Commonwealth v. Smith, 266 Pa. 511 , 109 A. 786 , 9 A.L.E. 922. In the second place, courts of equity in Pennsylvania are concerned only where property rights are involved. See Heasley v. Operative Plasterers & Cement Finishers International Association, Local No. 31, 324 Pa. 257 , 188 A. 206 ;
Kenneck v. Pennock, 305 Pa. 288 , 157 A. 613 ;
Ashinsky v. Levenson, 256 Pa. 14 , 100 A. 491 .
The order of the court below sustaining preliminary objections and dismissing the bill, is affirmed; appellant to pay the costs.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 7 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.