TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Loyer v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Loyer v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 199 F.2d 452 (6th Cir. 1952)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
October 10, 1952
Docket
No. 11492_1
Judges
Hicks, Martin, McALLISTER, Per Curiam
Citations
199 F.2d 45242 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 7101952 U.S. App. LEXIS 4114

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

This cause has been heard on the taxpayer’s petition to review a decision of the Tax Court of the United States and the answer of the respondent Commissioner of Internal Revenue thereto, and on the briefs and oral argument of the contending parties and the record in the cause:

*453 From all of which it appears that the sole issue presented is a question of fact as to whether the Commissioner of Internal Revenue committed error in the determination of the fair market value of a certain secured promissory note;

And the Tax Court, upon its findings of fact, having concluded that the Commissioner was correct in holding that the fair market value of the note in question was equal to its face value and there being substantial evidence to support this finding, which is certainly not clearly erroneous;

The decision of the Tax Court upholding the Commissioner’s determination of deficiency in the taxpayer’s income tax liability is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1959: 11960: 219592026peak 1960 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Bratton v. Commissioner31 T.C. 891 (Tax Ct. 1959)
  2. Bratton v. Commissioner283 F.2d 257 (6th Cir. 1960)
  3. O. D. Bratton v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v283 F.2d 257 (6th Cir. 1960)

Most recent

  1. O. D. Bratton v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v283 F.2d 257 (6th Cir. 1960)
  2. Bratton v. Commissioner283 F.2d 257 (6th Cir. 1960)
  3. Bratton v. Commissioner31 T.C. 891 (Tax Ct. 1959)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list