In re Bankers Life & Casualty Co.
Subsequent history: aff'd sub nom. Bankers Life & Cas. Co. v. Holland, 346 U.S. 379 (1953). (read from the later opinion; check before relying)
Opinion
*594 PER CURIAM.
Upon full consideration of the briefs and arguments on the motion to dismiss, the court is of the opinion that no fact or reason is stated showing that the relief by mandamus is an appropriate remedy. Without, therefore, determining, or considering on the merits, whether the order complained of was rightly entered, the motion to dismiss the petition, because the relief prayed for is not appropriate, is granted, and the petition is dismissed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 6 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. Holland
- Herbert Harrison Loum v. Honorable Mell G. Underwood, Chief Judge of the United States District Court, Eastern Division, Southern District of Ohio
- Willie Hullom v. W. Wallace Kent, District Judge
- Comfort Equipment Co. v. Steckler
- Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago v. General Electric Co.
- In re Turpentine & Rosin Factors, Inc., Pine Tree Products and P. J. Rooney, Praying for a Writ of Mandamus
Most recent
- Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago v. General Electric Co.
- Herbert Harrison Loum v. Honorable Mell G. Underwood, Chief Judge of the United States District Court, Eastern Division, Southern District of Ohio
- Willie Hullom v. W. Wallace Kent, District Judge
- In re Turpentine & Rosin Factors, Inc., Pine Tree Products and P. J. Rooney, Praying for a Writ of Mandamus
- Comfort Equipment Co. v. Steckler
- Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. Holland
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.