Condenser Service & Engineering Co., Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
CONDENSER SERVICE & ENGINEERING CO., Inc., Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Opinion
PER curiam:.
We have carefully considered the oral arguments, the record and the briefs in this case. We have concluded that the petitioner has not succeeded in bringing itself within the ruling of Levitt & Sons v. Nu-nan, 2 Cir., 142 F.2d 795, for the evidence offered by the petitioner does not meet the requirements set out in that decision. Had we the case before us de novo we would reach the same conclusions by the same reasoning as did the Tax Court of the United States.
A fortiori we cannot say that the findings of the Tax Court are clearly erroneous within the purview of United States v. U. S. Gypsum Company, 333 U.S. 364, 395 , 68 S.Ct. 525 , 92 L.Ed. 746 .
Accordingly the decision of the Tax Court will be affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.