Jaroshuk v. United States
JAROSHUK Et Al. v. UNITED STATES
Opinion
*53 PER CURIAM.
This appeal is from a conviction under an Indictment charging violations of the counterfeiting statutes, 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 472 and 474, relating to the altering of and the possession of altered currency of the United States. The sole claim of error relates to the admission of evidence obtained as the result of a search and seizure without a warrant. No federal officer participated either in the search or in the seizure of the articles introduced in evidence, and no federal officer had knowledge thereof until a later time and after the articles had been taken by local police to the police station. There is no evidence of collusion between the police and the federal officer to whom the articles were eventually delivered. It further appears from the record that the ■search made by the police was solely for the purpose of discovering a suspected violation of state laws.
The judgment is accordingly affirmed on the authority of Lustig v. United States, 338 U.S. 74 , 69 S.Ct. 1372 , 93 L.Ed. 1819 , and Symons v. United States, 9 Cir., 178 F.2d 615, 618 , certiorari denied, 339 U.S. 985 , 70 S.Ct. 1006 , 94 L.Ed. 1388 .
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.