TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Ry., and Motor Coach Employees of America, Division No. 1127, Etc. v. Southern Bus Lines, Inc. (Two Cases)

Amalgamated Ass'n of St., Elec. Ry., & Motor Coach Employees of Am., Div. No. 1127, Etc. v. Southern Bus Lines, Inc. (Two Cases), 201 F.2d 53 (5th Cir. 1953)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
January 14, 1953
Docket
No. 13940_1
Citations
201 F.2d 5331 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2303

Opinion

201 F.2d 53

AMALGAMATED ASS'N OF STREET, ELECTRIC RY., AND MOTOR COACH EMPLOYEES OF AMERICA, DIVISION NO. 1127, etc., et al., v. SOUTHERN BUS LINES, Inc. (two cases).

No. 13939.

No. 13940.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

January 14, 1953.

Evelyn Hunt Conner, Bay St. Louis, Miss., L. Barrett Jones, Jackson, Miss., Ben Stevens, Hattiesburg, Miss., for appellants.

Robert C. Cannada, Jackson, Miss., Grove Stafford, Alexandria, La., for appellees.

Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and HOLMES and RIVES, Circuit Judges.

HUTCHESON, Chief Judge.

1

When these two cases were here before, the appeals were from judgments dismissing the complaints on the merits for failure to state a cause of action.

2

Of the opinion that they should have been dismissed for want of jurisdiction, this court reversed the judgments and remanded the causes, with specific directions to dismiss them for want of jurisdiction. 1 3

This time the appeals are from judgments entered not only in accordance with the law of the state as established on the former appeals, but in execution of, and in precise accord with, our mandates.

4

In such circumstances, unlike where judgments of reversal are general, appeals from the judgments entered on the mandates present nothing for our review. The appeals are, therefore, dismissed. 2

Notes:

1

5 Cir., 189 F.2d 219 , at page 222 2

28 U.S.C.A. § 2106 , note 390; Merrill v. National Bank, 5 Cir., 78 F. 208 , and cases cited; Singer Mfg. v. Adams, 5 Cir., 185 F. 768 ; Seagraves v. Wallace, 5 Cir., 69 F.2d 163 , at page 164

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Seagraves v. Wallace, 69 F.2d 163 (5th Cir. 1934) 34
Amalgamated Ass'n of St., Elec. Ry. & Motor Coach Employees of Am., Div. No. 1127 v. Southern Bus Lines, Inc., 189 F.2d 219 (5th Cir. 1951) 18
Merrill v. Nat'l Bank of Jacksonville, 78 F. 208 (5th Cir. 1896) 5
Singer Mfg. Co. v. Adams, 185 F. 768 (5th Cir. 1911) 2

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list