Gray v. Reuther
GRAY v. REUTHER Et Al.
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
This appeal from dismissal by the district court of the complaint on motion of appellees came on to be heard;
And the record and the briefs and oral arguments of attorneys having been duly considered, this court is of opinion that the action of the District Judge in dismissing the complaint was well grounded, for the reasons stated in his succinct opinion to the effect that the complaint failed to state a class action, cf. Giordano v. Radio Corporation of America, 3 Cir., 183 F.2d 558 , and for the further reason that the local union, which was not joined as a party to the suit, is an indispensable party; and, if joined as a party defendant, such joining would result in defeating jurisdiction for lack of diversity of citizenship ;
And, moreover, it appears that the appellant herein has failed to exhaust his remedies within the labor organization, as required by the Union Constitution. See Reigel v. Harrison, 6 Cir., 157 F.2d 140 .
Accordingly, the order of the district court granting appellees’ motion to dismiss the action is affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(action to set aside union election)
Cited by 10 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Underwood v. Maloney
- Carroll v. Associated Musicians of Greater New York
- Rose v. Giamatti
- Mamula v. UNITED STEELWORKERS of A.
- Cutler v. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF MUSICIANS OF US & CANADA
- Gotthard Hanson, as a Member of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America v. Madeline W. Hutcheson, Etc.
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.