United States v. Canadian American Company, Inc.
United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Appellant v. Canadian American Company, Inc., James Albert Wigmore, Pearl Johnstone Wigmore, Westbury Farm & Land Corporation, William E. Sheene, Jr., National Munitions Company, Eldred, Pennsylvania, Clyde M. Guild, as Liquidation Agent, National Munitions Company, Eldred, Pennsylvania, Town of North Hempstead and Sadie Schwartz, the Incorporated Village of Old Westbury and County of Nassau, Defendants-Appellants-Appellees
Opinion
202 F.2d 751 53-1 USTC P 9286
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Appellant, v. CANADIAN AMERICAN COMPANY, Inc., James Albert Wigmore, Pearl Johnstone Wigmore, Westbury Farm & Land Corporation, William E. Sheene, Jr., National Munitions Company, Eldred, Pennsylvania, Clyde M. Guild, as Liquidation Agent, National Munitions Company, Eldred, Pennsylvania, Town of North Hempstead and Sadie Schwartz, Defendants, The Incorporated Village of Old Westbury and County of Nassau, Defendants-Appellants-Appellees.
No. 178, Docket 22583.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued March 11, 1953. Decided April 1, 1953.
H. Brian Holland, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ellis N. Slack, A. F. Prescott and Homer R. Miller, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., and Frank J. Parker, U.S. Atty., Brooklyn, N.Y., for United States of America, plaintiff-appellee-appellant.
J. Oakey McKnight, Mineola, N.Y., for Village of Old Westbury, defendant-appellant-appellee.
G. Burchard Smith, County Atty. of Nassau County, Mineola, N.Y., Francis J. Donovan, Deputy County Atty., Mineola, N.Y., of counsel, for Nassau County, defendant-appellant-appellee.
Before AUGUSTUS N. HAND, CHASE and CLARK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
1
The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the District Court, 108 F.Supp. 206 .
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.