Arbolino v. Shaughnessy, District Director Sessa v. Shaughnessy, District Director
ARBOLINO v. SHAUGHNESSY, District Director Et Al.; SESSA v. SHAUGHNESSY, District Director Et Al.
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
Since the defendants have no duty but to direct the plaintiff to report in Texas, and that is merely a transmission of the order of the Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization in Washington, the action is within the decisions of the Supreme Court in Blackmar v. Guerre, 342 U.S. 512 [ 72 S.Ct. 410 , 96 L.Ed. 534 ] and of this court in Reeber v. Rossel, 2 Cir., 200 F.2d 334 . In Williams v. Fanning, 332 U.S. 490 [ 68 S.Ct. 188 , 92 L.Ed. 95 ], the Postmaster was himself stopping the receipt of the magazine; an injunction against that was complete relief.
Motion denied.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.